Main UNDP Home Page    
UNDP Homepage UNDP Homepage UNDP Homepage
UNDP logodividerdividerdividerdivider
16.1 What is the process of procurement & tendering?
16.2 What are the procedures for procurement?
16.3 What is procurement documentation?
16.4 What is the process of evaluation?
16.5 What are the rules of fair procurement?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Module 16: Tendering and Procurement


16.4. What is the process of evaluation?


A one-stage proposal evaluation...

...uses two initial screens:

◊ Proposals are evaluated for their mandatory requirements. If any of these requirements have not been met, the potential partner can be eliminated from the shortlist.

◊ Proposals that do not adequately and clearly demonstrate financial or managerial capability or previous experience can also be eliminated, further reducing the shortlist.

Once the proposals have been through these two screens, a shortlist will have been created. The proposals that remain can then be evaluated based on the criteria set out in the RFP.


In a two-stage proposal evaluation,...

... all of the submissions will have been received from participants who have already been shortlisted through the RFEI or RFQ process. As such, all proposals will be evaluated. Members of the project team may score the projects individually, and then aggregate the scores, or they may score each project together by consensus.

As in the case of the one-stage proposal evaluation, a specific number of the highest ranked submissions will be shortlisted to receive a Request for Proposals.

As a matter of courtesy to potential partners eliminated in the RFEI or RFQ process, meetings with unsuccessful proponents should be held on request to discuss why they were not shortlisted. This session is important as it provides access and answers to questions for unsuccessful applicants, as well as providing them with a better understanding of the process for the next time the local government issues a RFEI or RFQ. It will also improve the quality of submissions received by the local government in the future, as more participants will have a greater understanding of the process and its requirements.


Developing evaluation criteria

Evaluation criteria vary depending on the type of project and end users. They can include the following:

– understanding of the needs of the local government;

– previous experience of the bidder;

– legality of the proposed solution;

– commitment of the proposed partner to achieving a solution that will benefit all parties;

– likelihood that the bidder can achieve the proposed solution;

– management capacity of the bidder;

– financial stability of the bidder;

– municipal priorities and policies; and

– proposed solutions for dealing with labour unions and local government employees affected by the arrangement.

 

© 2004 UNDP,  Manufactured by Margraf Publishers GmbH, Germany

Access to the Modules:
divider
S T A R T P A G E
divider
01-Starting out
divider
02-Strategic Planning
divider
 03-Planning & Organising
divider
 04-Collecting Information
divider
05-Identifying Constraints
divider
06-Defining Objectives
divider
07-Defing Parameters (Scope)
divider
08-Establishing Principles
divider
09-Identifying Partners
divider
10-Establishing Partnership
divider
11-Selecting Options
divider
12-Financing (Investment)
divider
13-Financing (Cost Recovery)
divider
14-Preparing Business Plans
divider
15-Regulating the PPP
divider
 – 16-Tendering & Procurement
divider
17-Negotiating & Contracting
divider
18-Managing PPPs
divider
19-Monitoring & Evaluation
divider
20-Managing Conflict
divider
21-Building Development
divider