|
Module 12: Financing (investments)
12.4. What are the key steps?
...‘Reality check’
...Business valuation
...Investment projects feasibility analysis
...Investments programme design
...Approval and Realisation
1. Perform a "reality check"
“Reality check” implies the simplest kind of comparison
if the potential benefits and costs of the project. The reality check
is a benchmark scoring system that sets a baseline and establishes
the strategic thinking and tactical work required to achieve the goal.
It is based on answering basic questions about the project,
such as:
◊ Does the proposed project have a realistic chance of succeeding?
◊ Does the business concept to be based on a sound technical and
business principles?
◊ Is there enough time between now and the date of the project
results delivery?
◊ Are adequate financial resources available?
◊ Is there a political will? etc.
2. Perform business valuation 
A business valuation is a formal opinion regarding
the estimated value of an ownership interest in a business entity at
a given point in time. There are a number of instances
when there is a need to determine the market value of a company. Raising
funds is one of them.
There are a wide range of factors that go into the process
-- from the book value to a host of tangible and intangible
elements. In general, the value of the business will rely
on an analysis of the company's cash flow. In other words, it's ability
to generate consistent profits will ultimately determine its worth
in the marketplace. An accurate business valuation requires financial
analysis as well as many other aspects of a business including:
◊ Management capabilities
◊ Company strengths, weaknesses and vulnerabilities
◊ The competitive environment
◊ Overall expectations for the marketplace
◊ Current and future economic prospects for the industry
This whole process of business valuation is one of those
areas in business where hiring a professional to provide
this service is essential.
3. Perform investment projects feasibility
analysis 
CBA provides a mean for systematically comparing
the value of outcomes with the value of resources achieving the
outcomes required. It measures the economic efficiency
of the proposed technology or project. When all else
is equal more efficient projects should be chosen over less efficient
ones. When there are many options to consider during a decision-making
task, it is useful to evaluate the options with a common metric. CBA
refers to any type of structured method for evaluating decision options.
A CBA application includes the following stages:
1. General description of the project:
This part includes
an explanation on the environment under which each analysis
is done such as the objectives, the assumptions, the project/decision
life etc.
2. List of alternative scenarios:
In order to decide which
is the best option in the CBA we have to consider the
costs and the benefits for each of these options. This section
lists the options considered during the analysis.
3. Identify Benefits and Costs:
In this part, the application
lists the exact benefits and costs met in each of the
alternative scenarios. The application divides these into
two kinds: The ones that are relatively straightforward to be
measured and the ones that are not very easy to be measured. Many
factors must be considered during the process of estimating the
costs associated with competing alternatives in a CBA.
– All
costs for the full system life cycle for each competing alternative
must be included. The following factors must be addressed: Activities
and Resources, Cost Categories, Personnel Costs, Direct and Indirect
Costs (Overhead), Depreciation, and Annual Costs.
– Benefits are the services, capabilities, and qualities of each
alternative system, and can be viewed as the return from
an investment. To estimate benefits, first identify the benefits for
both the customers and the organization that provides the service(s)
to the customers.
4. Schedule Benefits and Costs:
For each of the alternatives defined
in step 2, the user now identifies the value of each benefit and cost
for each year through the life cycle of the decision beginning from Year
0, which is the start of the decision life. After the costs and benefits
for each year of the system life cycle have been estimated, convert them
to a common unit of measurement to properly compare competing alternatives.
That is accomplished by discounting future values, which transforms future
benefits and costs to their "present value." The present value
(also referred to as the discounted value) of a future amount is calculated
with the following formula:
P = F (1/(1+I)n), where P = Present Value,
F = Future Value, I = Interest Rate, and n = number of years.
5. Comparison of alternatives:
In this part the application compares
the alternative solutions. The comparison is illustrated with tables
and graphs so as to facilitate decision making. When the costs and benefits
for each competing alternative have been discounted, compare and rank
the discounted net value (discounted benefit minus discounted cost) of
the competing alternatives. When the alternative with the lowest discounted
cost provides the highest discounted benefits, it is clearly the best
alternative.
6. Sensitivity Analysis:
In this part the application helps
the user define how sensitive the results are to changes in the costs
and benefits. This sensitivity involves costs and benefits whose definition
is not straightforward or is not easy to be exactly defined. Sensitivity
analysis tests the sensitivity and reliability of the results obtained
from the cost-benefit analysis. Since the CBA is normally the key document
in the investment review process, reviewers want assurance that the analysis
is reliable. Sensitivity analysis identifies those input parameters that
have the greatest influence on the outcome, repeats the analysis with
different input parameter values, and evaluates the results to determine
which, if any, input parameters are sensitive. If a relatively small
change in the value of an input parameter changes the alternative selected,
then the analysis is considered to be sensitive to that parameter. If
the value of a parameter has to be doubled before there is a change in
the selected alternative, the analysis is not considered to be sensitive
to that parameter. The estimates for sensitive input parameters should
be re-examined to ensure that they are as accurate as possible.
4. Design capital investment programme 
Capital investment program is a multi-year plan of capital
projects listed in priority order by year with anticipated
beginning and completion dates, annual estimation costs
and proposed methods of financing. Annually, the program is reviewed,
revised and projected one year.
There is a number of reasons for designing the investment
program:
1. PPP projects require multi-year expenditures because
they are expensive and may take more then one year to
design and construct.
2. PPP projects often involve multiple sources of financing
such as current funds, debts and grants, which must be
accounted for separately.
3. Financial resources for capital projects are limited
and therefore must be conspired and allocated in a systematic
manner.
Capital investment program design is a dynamic process
that involves several steps. The complexity of the process
depends on the law, extend of central government regulation and local
government size, organization structure, staff capability and financial
conditions.

© 2004 UNDP, Manufactured
by Margraf Publishers GmbH, Germany |